Blog Index
The journal that this archive was targeting has been deleted. Please update your configuration.
Navigation
« In the presence of greatness | Main | After the curtain comes down »
Wednesday
Sep182013

Authenticity vs. preparation?

Deborah Kerr and Yul Brynner in "The King and I"

People who work with me know I believe there are few hard and fast rules for public speaking. We each have our own authentic presence, which we must discover and fully inhabit in order to be at our best. And the path to that presence differs for each of us. There are a couple of things I do insist on, though, for everyone--and one of them is preparation. If you are asked to speak it is because your opinion is valued and you have knowledge and insight to share. But every situation is different, so you need to give some thought to exactly what you want to say and how you want to say it each and every time. Surprisingly, I get push-back from clients who resist thorough preparation because they fear they will lose "authenticity" if they lay the necessary groundwork before they step in front of an audience.

"Is a puzzlement"

. . .as Anna's King of Siam would say. I find this all rather hard to understand: as someone trained in acting, having spent weeks in preparation for a particular role, I know that the truest route to authenticity is to be so thoroughly grounded in what you are doing you can live in the moment. But there is a belief circulating among some of my clients that knowing what you are going to say--beyond a vague idea and a couple of words jotted on a napkin--is a barrier to being your authentic self.  "I didn't really prepare much, but I was fine," is the refrain I hear all too often.

But is "fine" good enough? The truth is we can't be better at anything without putting in the work. I know some folks are pressed for time. Others use this fear of inauthenticity as an excuse for laziness. But something else may be going on as well--a misunderstanding of both authenticity and preparation. I am told that being well-prepared can be bad when it causes you to come across as "scripted"--which I take to mean reading words off the page, without any real understanding, not to mention investment in, or enjoyment of, the message. This is not true preparation. False prep of this kind can become like armor you put on to protect yourself, or a barrier you hide behind. It definitely inhibits authentic connection. Good, thorough preparation actually frees you so you can fully communicate. It allows you to connect with your listeners using words, vocal tone, gestures, body language, and eye contact. When you prepare, you are liberated from fumbling around thinking "What do I say next?" and can be fully focused and fully present.

And what could be more authentic than that?

Reader Comments (2)

Love this. As someone who is doing more and more speaking, I sometimes find the amount of prep to be intimidating. But it always pays off.

September 19, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterRuth Eerhart

Ruth-
It does pay off. Always. I tell clients if they do the prep work up front they will save at least as much time afterwards, since they won't be cleaning up their own messaging messes!

October 10, 2013 | Registered CommenterAnn Timmons

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>